remay

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:5,222 Points:1,760,195 Joined:May 2006
|
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 8:37:00 AM
good deal...
|
rbrk02

Champion Author
Rhode Island
Posts:3,022 Points:455,180 Joined:Jan 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 8:29:55 PM
A new efficient power plant is good news. Natural gas in place of coal? Even better.
|
DanMtz

Champion Author
Oakland
Posts:1,527 Points:881,500 Joined:Oct 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 6:21:49 PM
Good. Out with the old coal plants, in with the new NG plants.
|
Buckeyee

Champion Author
Maine
Posts:2,422 Points:557,655 Joined:May 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 11:14:17 AM
I would have NG power plants then oil fired ones. I also hope Maine gets more NG capacity to heat homes instead of oil.
|
kx250

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:1,416 Points:769,975 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 9:58:49 AM
@joseyski Just remember, you can always do a reverse sit-in and and un-occupy yourself from the grid to show how much you really hate that which is economical and reliable. Another idea would be to plug your EV into your solar panels and only take it out whenever you have enough of a charge to go somewhere.
But thumbing your nose at that which makes your life so convenient is just plain hypocritical, wouldn't you agree?
|
scu227

Champion Author
New Haven
Posts:2,210 Points:419,700 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 9:51:43 AM
OK
|
orphancarguyPE

Champion Author
PEI
Posts:2,181 Points:420,480 Joined:Jan 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 9:24:45 AM
Safer and cheaper than nuclear power, cleaner and cheaper than coal---once you account for all the after production cleanup and waste storage costs. For nuclear, essentially, that is 'forever' and perhaps thousands of years after the last watt is generated.
|
kress999

Sophomore Author
Alabama
Posts:214 Points:248,970 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 9:06:25 AM
safer than nukes and cleaner than coal.
|
Joeski1

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:7,464 Points:1,379,785 Joined:Dec 2004
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 9:05:38 AM
not nearly as dangerous as a nuke plant is right now...
we are within the evac circles of not 1 or 2 or 3 nuke plants... but 4..
I'll take the unnatural gas plant for now if they shutter the nuke plants one by one...
then they'll just have to figure out to do with the roughly 700 metric tons of radioactive waste stored at each plant...
[Edited by: Joeski1 at 2/9/2012 9:06:30 AM EST]
|
joseph000

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,063 Points:205,665 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 8:54:30 AM
Have you seen "Gasland", because if much of it is true, then gas is no escape from disaster either, we need water even more than energy.
|
Joeski1

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:7,464 Points:1,379,785 Joined:Dec 2004
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 8:52:12 AM
Here is one end user for all that unnatural gas there seems to be so much of...
still it's better than another nuke or coal plant by a mile....
|